<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>booktwo.org &#187; Displays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booktwo.org/tag/displays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booktwo.org</link>
	<description>The future of Literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 09:55:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A better way to read?</title>
		<link>http://booktwo.org/notebook/a-better-way-to-read/</link>
		<comments>http://booktwo.org/notebook/a-better-way-to-read/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 13:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Bridle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booktwo.org/notebook/a-better-way-to-read/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The subject of reading from electronic screens is a matter of ongoing debate. Many claim people will simply never read off screens in the way that they read off paper now. Excepting <a href="http://www.booktwo.org/notebook/tag/eink/">e-ink-based paper</a>, which promises to revolutionise our understanding of &#8220;the screen&#8221;, are there simple ways to improve our reading experience on the web?</p>
<p><span id="more-161"></span>Despite a large amount of research in the area, there is no generally accepted &#8216;best&#8217; way of reading text. Indeed, many research papers (<a href="http://www.umr.edu/lite/tech_reports/LITE-2003-04.pdf">such as this one</a>) note that no researcher has come to a conclusive result on this. Bigger text is better,... <a href="http://booktwo.org/notebook/a-better-way-to-read/" class="read_more"><br /><br />Read the rest of this post &#8594;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The subject of reading from electronic screens is a matter of ongoing debate. Many claim people will simply never read off screens in the way that they read off paper now. Excepting <a href="http://www.booktwo.org/notebook/tag/eink/">e-ink-based paper</a>, which promises to revolutionise our understanding of &#8220;the screen&#8221;, are there simple ways to improve our reading experience on the web?</p>
<p><span id="more-161"></span>Despite a large amount of research in the area, there is no generally accepted &#8216;best&#8217; way of reading text. Indeed, many research papers (<a href="http://www.umr.edu/lite/tech_reports/LITE-2003-04.pdf">such as this one</a>) note that no researcher has come to a conclusive result on this. Bigger text is better, but not always aesthetically so, or when there is a large amount of information to fit onto a single page. Colour is another subject of debate: high-contrast text is good, but we seem to have inherited the traditional black-on-white that originally occurred purely to save money on ink. Such concerns are no longer relevant. There was even a period when white text on a black field could be said to be more economical (<a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/02/black_google_wo.php">see this article</a>) but as CRT monitors are phased out in favour of LCD, there is no argument for this either.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.booktwo.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/writeroom-screen.png" alt="writeroom-screen.png" /></p>
<p>One of my favourite little applications is called <a href="http://www.hogbaysoftware.com/product/writeroom">Writeroom</a> &#8211;  a small OSX application that allows you to write &#8216;in seclusion&#8217; by hiding everything on the screen apart from the words you&#8217;re typing (there&#8217;s also a PC version &#8211; <a href="http://they.misled.us/dark-room">Dark Room</a>). The default view (shown above) is green on black, which, alongside the size and font, is completely configurable. I&#8217;ve found the default setting the best, and the easiest on the eye.</p>
<p>So, as an experiment, you can now read <strong>booktwo.org</strong> in such a format &#8211; just click that &#8220;Enhanced Reading Style&#8221; link in the sidebar to switch to an enlarged, green-and-black view of the main body of the page you&#8217;re looking at. To switch back, just click the whitetext button in the top right corner of the new page. <a href="#" onclick="setActiveStyleSheet('Enhanced Reading Style');  return false;" title="Switch to Enhanced Reading Style">Try it now.</a> We think it will help with long articles and tired eyes.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all done in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascading_Style_Sheets">CSS</a> &#8211; you&#8217;re looking at exactly the same content, but with a different layout and colour scheme applied, via <a href="http://alistapart.com/stories/alternate/">an open-source javascript stylesheet switcher</a>. As <strong>booktwo.org</strong> is already written in fully <a href="http://webstandards.org/">valid XHTML and CSS</a>, it took about half an hour to set this up. This is the kind of thing that is possible for everyone to do, and I think we&#8217;ll see more user-control of pages as the web evolves &#8211; many already allow resizing of text, color and layout are the next step.</p>
<p>Is it easy to use? Would you like it in more colour combinations or sizes? What other sites and applications would benefit from this? Let us know what you think.</p>
<p>UPDATE 21/6/07: After quite a lot of feedback, it appears people definitely prefer white on black to green on black, so have changed the enhanced reading style accordingly. I&#8217;ve also increased the line-spacing significantly. Better?</p>
<p>UPDATE 17/9/07: Put images back into the enhanced version. Not really sure why I took them out in the first place&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://booktwo.org/notebook/a-better-way-to-read/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eInk Off the Page</title>
		<link>http://booktwo.org/notebook/eink-off-the-page/</link>
		<comments>http://booktwo.org/notebook/eink-off-the-page/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Bridle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Displays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eInk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booktwo.org/notebook/eink-off-the-page/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://www.mobileread.com/">MobileRead</a>, an extraordinary visualisation of the possibilities of e-ink by a London-based designer. Instead of book pages however, vast expanses of the London Underground are papered over:</p>
<p><embed style="width:400px; height:326px;" id="VideoPlayback" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=7333572698876423602&#038;hl=en-GB" flashvars=""> </embed></p>
<p>For a higher-res version, see <a href="http://www.alexgriffin.org/">Alex Griffin&#8217;s website</a> (under Design > E*Ink).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://www.mobileread.com/">MobileRead</a>, an extraordinary visualisation of the possibilities of e-ink by a London-based designer. Instead of book pages however, vast expanses of the London Underground are papered over:</p>
<p><embed style="width:400px; height:326px;" id="VideoPlayback" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=7333572698876423602&#038;hl=en-GB" flashvars=""> </embed></p>
<p>For a higher-res version, see <a href="http://www.alexgriffin.org/">Alex Griffin&#8217;s website</a> (under Design > E*Ink).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://booktwo.org/notebook/eink-off-the-page/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

