<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Books in the landfill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/</link>
	<description>The future of Literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:00:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s in a book that I should buy it? &#171; Nehemiah Blake</title>
		<link>http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/comment-page-1/#comment-66328</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s in a book that I should buy it? &#171; Nehemiah Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/#comment-66328</guid>
		<description>[...] are always returns. James Bridle of booktwo.org estimates that for some publishers this return rate is as high as 50 percent. He notes that: &#8220;half of all books printed in the UK are never read. And they’re not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are always returns. James Bridle of booktwo.org estimates that for some publishers this return rate is as high as 50 percent. He notes that: &#8220;half of all books printed in the UK are never read. And they’re not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Null Pointer &#187; Latest Story Technology Zindagi Online &#187; PODvantage</title>
		<link>http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/comment-page-1/#comment-66279</link>
		<dc:creator>Null Pointer &#187; Latest Story Technology Zindagi Online &#187; PODvantage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/#comment-66279</guid>
		<description>[...] unread books are converted back to pulp or dumped since most are not printed on recycled paper. The amount of carbon emissions in printed these books that are never read is staggering, it’s like putting 1 lac cars on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unread books are converted back to pulp or dumped since most are not printed on recycled paper. The amount of carbon emissions in printed these books that are never read is staggering, it’s like putting 1 lac cars on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: प्रिंट आन डिमांड से लेखक बने प्रकाशक &#124; सामयिकी - हिन्दी वेबपत्रिका &#124; Samayiki - Hindi Webzine</title>
		<link>http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/comment-page-1/#comment-66237</link>
		<dc:creator>प्रिंट आन डिमांड से लेखक बने प्रकाशक &#124; सामयिकी - हिन्दी वेबपत्रिका &#124; Samayiki - Hindi Webzine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/#comment-66237</guid>
		<description>[...] कभी पढ़ीं नहीं जातीं, की छपाई में जितना कार्बन उत्सर्जन होता है वह एक लाख कारों द्वारा होते कार्बन [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] कभी पढ़ीं नहीं जातीं, की छपाई में जितना कार्बन उत्सर्जन होता है वह एक लाख कारों द्वारा होते कार्बन [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s in a book that I should buy it? &#171; Nehemiah &#38; Blake</title>
		<link>http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/comment-page-1/#comment-24220</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s in a book that I should buy it? &#171; Nehemiah &#38; Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/#comment-24220</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are always returns. James Bridle of booktwo.org estimates that for some publishers this return rate is as high as 50 percent. He notes that: &#8220;half of all books printed in the UK are never read. And theyre not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Reece</title>
		<link>http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/comment-page-1/#comment-14970</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Reece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/#comment-14970</guid>
		<description>At AOnL we&#039;re definitely onside with this, having spent the past ten years initially banging the e-book drum, then retrenching to the POD position where, theoretically, the books are not produced until they are wanted.

However, a worrying trend is emerging. Whilst the &#039;newcomers&#039; to the book trade, such as Amazon, are grasping the concept of POD quite well and, in fact, revelling in it as it fits exactly their &#039;just in time&#039; attitude to stock management, the &#039;old school&#039; - Gardners in particular regard POD as merely an alternative source of titles.

A particular recent event demonstrates this. One of our authors, having put in an immense amount of effort, persuaded dozens of individual branches of Waterstones to stock her book - produced by us in POD format. Waterstones ordering policy requires all product to be sourced via their wholesalers so a series of orders hit Gardners, who responded by consolidating their Waterstone orders to us and adding on some more copies &#039;for good measure&#039;. Whilst sales were good, indeed, probably exceeding the author&#039;s expectations, there were still many unsold copies on Waterstone&#039;s shelves following the Christmas Book Buying Frenzy and before the New Year New Titles (due to over-ordering by the branches)
so these went back to Gardners.

Despite our &#039;no returns on POD&#039; agreement with Gardners they made a serious attempt to persuade us to take back the bulk of this &#039;overstock&#039; and it took some serious negotiating to persuade them otherwise.

So, who is at fault here? Should the author be blamed for enthusiastic promotion? Should the various Booksellers be blamed for wanting to provide choice for their customers? Should the wholesaler be blamed for making bad stock management decisions?

I think the real culprit here is the delivery medium itself - the book. Even in the early days of AOnL, I disliked the concept of sitting at a computer to read a book. I campaigned vigorously on the side of the universally convenient paperback novel but eventually common sense prevailed, particularly with my proofreading work, and I became accustomed to reading offscreen. I now use a combination of my mobile phone and laptop to store (and edit) the books and aside from a somewhat limited supply of electronic material for personal enjoyment reading, I can&#039;t imagine needing to read a paper book again. Real life continues though, and sadly it is unlikely to change dramatically in the remaining twilight years of my life but at least I&#039;ll be able to keep myself warm in front of an open fireplace burning........books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At AOnL we&#8217;re definitely onside with this, having spent the past ten years initially banging the e-book drum, then retrenching to the POD position where, theoretically, the books are not produced until they are wanted.</p>
<p>However, a worrying trend is emerging. Whilst the &#8216;newcomers&#8217; to the book trade, such as Amazon, are grasping the concept of POD quite well and, in fact, revelling in it as it fits exactly their &#8216;just in time&#8217; attitude to stock management, the &#8216;old school&#8217; &#8211; Gardners in particular regard POD as merely an alternative source of titles.</p>
<p>A particular recent event demonstrates this. One of our authors, having put in an immense amount of effort, persuaded dozens of individual branches of Waterstones to stock her book &#8211; produced by us in POD format. Waterstones ordering policy requires all product to be sourced via their wholesalers so a series of orders hit Gardners, who responded by consolidating their Waterstone orders to us and adding on some more copies &#8216;for good measure&#8217;. Whilst sales were good, indeed, probably exceeding the author&#8217;s expectations, there were still many unsold copies on Waterstone&#8217;s shelves following the Christmas Book Buying Frenzy and before the New Year New Titles (due to over-ordering by the branches)<br />
so these went back to Gardners.</p>
<p>Despite our &#8216;no returns on POD&#8217; agreement with Gardners they made a serious attempt to persuade us to take back the bulk of this &#8216;overstock&#8217; and it took some serious negotiating to persuade them otherwise.</p>
<p>So, who is at fault here? Should the author be blamed for enthusiastic promotion? Should the various Booksellers be blamed for wanting to provide choice for their customers? Should the wholesaler be blamed for making bad stock management decisions?</p>
<p>I think the real culprit here is the delivery medium itself &#8211; the book. Even in the early days of AOnL, I disliked the concept of sitting at a computer to read a book. I campaigned vigorously on the side of the universally convenient paperback novel but eventually common sense prevailed, particularly with my proofreading work, and I became accustomed to reading offscreen. I now use a combination of my mobile phone and laptop to store (and edit) the books and aside from a somewhat limited supply of electronic material for personal enjoyment reading, I can&#8217;t imagine needing to read a paper book again. Real life continues though, and sadly it is unlikely to change dramatically in the remaining twilight years of my life but at least I&#8217;ll be able to keep myself warm in front of an open fireplace burning&#8230;&#8230;..books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Times Emit: Fair Trade Books?</title>
		<link>http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/comment-page-1/#comment-12363</link>
		<dc:creator>Times Emit: Fair Trade Books?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/#comment-12363</guid>
		<description>[...] this week blogged about books and landfill. After visiting a major warehouse a couple of years ago, I was shocked that any return - even mint, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this week blogged about books and landfill. After visiting a major warehouse a couple of years ago, I was shocked that any return &#8211; even mint, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Lee</title>
		<link>http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/comment-page-1/#comment-12326</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booktwo.org/notebook/books-in-the-landfill/#comment-12326</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today is the first day of a year without buying (or reading) a printed book. This is partly down to disgust at the waste in the book industry, partly as a step towards a buy nothing lifestyle and partly to put alternative media to the test. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

